Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 560 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 277 vs 269 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - £49.95 vs £224.88
- Up to 77% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-8700 - £0.19 vs £0.81 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £224.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10431 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
269
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |