Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4216 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-840QM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 7% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Core i7-840QM - 173 vs 162 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-840QM doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
173
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£67.08
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £67.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-840QM | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Clarksfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |