Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8350 is 856 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i7-840QM - 68 vs 65 FPS
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-840QM
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-840QM | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
