Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Core i7-7920HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1207 days newer than Core i7-7920HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7920HQ
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 11% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i7-7920HQ - 82 vs 74 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
82
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.74/FPS
100%
Price, £
£225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7920HQ | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |