Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 293 days older than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 180 vs 179 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
179
99.44444444444444%
Value, £/FPS
£0.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2543 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |