Buy on Amazon
£150.72
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 976 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 151% better in League of Legends than Celeron G4900 - 173 vs 69 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - £59.75 vs £150.72
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 54 vs 91 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Core I7-6700K Processor (4 GHz, 8 M Cache, LGA1151)
Buy for £150.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G4900 Processor 3.1 GHz 2 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-6700K
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
41.62162162162162%
Multi-Core
1051
21.46211966510108%
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 91 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
