Buy on Amazon
£188.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700K is 521 days older than the more expensive Core i7-7700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-7700 - 185 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - £188.88 vs £208.88
- Up to 12% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-7700 - £1.02 vs £1.16 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-6700K
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
185
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.02/FPS
100%
Price, £
£188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core I7-6700K Processor (4 GHz, 8 M Cache, LGA1151)
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11274 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-7700 Retail - (1151/Quad Core/3.60GHz/8MB/Kabylake/65W/Graphics) - BX80677I77700
Buy for £208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-6700K
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Core i7-7700
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 91 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
