Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 3393 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 25 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 17% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-640LM - 141 vs 121 FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
141
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.77/FPS
100%
Price, £
£108.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £108.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12985 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |