Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 211 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 19% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Athlon 3000G - 360 vs 303 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Athlon 3000G - £0.3 vs £0.33 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - £100.0 vs £108.88
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
360
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.3/FPS
100%
Price, £
£108.88
91%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £108.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14737 minutes ago
Buy for £100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14525 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Athlon |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |