Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 2558 days older than Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 47 vs 65 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4800MQ | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
