Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Core i7-4710MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2893 days newer than Core i7-4710MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4710MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 2% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i7-4710MQ - 182 vs 179 FPS
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
182
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£74.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £74.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4354 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Apr 14th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4710MQ | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Apr 14th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |