Buy on Amazon
£117.36
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Core i7-4650U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2842 days newer than Core i7-4650U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4650U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 9% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-4650U - 307 vs 281 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4650U - 12 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
307
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£117.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL - CLIENT CPU CORE I5-11400F 2.60GHZ SKTLGA1200 12.00MB CACHE BOXED
Buy for £117.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4650U
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4650U | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i7-4650U or Core i5-11400F
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
80 FPS
£11.25/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660
Core i5-11400F
16 GB, 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
£899.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
