Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Core i7-3667U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3208 days newer than Core i7-3667U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3667U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 28% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i7-3667U - 194 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3667U - 16 vs 4 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.13/FPS
100%
Price, £
£218.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £218.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12341 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3667U | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |