Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1126 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Core i3-8300 - 158 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - £176.66 vs £218.66
- Up to 15% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-11900F - £1.17 vs £1.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 62 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
158
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.38/FPS
84%
Price, £
£218.66
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for £218.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
151
95%
Value, £/FPS
£1.17/FPS
100%
Price, £
£176.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £176.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 62 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |