Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i7-3610QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1226 days newer than Core i7-3610QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3610QM
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 45 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Minecraft than Core i7-3610QM - 614 vs 607 FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-3610QM
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2012
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3610QM | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
