Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 667 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G3900 - 197 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 64 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | EPYC |
| Skylake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
