Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Core i7-3517U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3208 days newer than Core i7-3517U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3517U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 18% better in New World than Core i7-3517U - 116 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3517U - 8 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
116
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.6/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £69.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3517U | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |