Buy on Amazon
£428.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 2084 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2675QM
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 39% better in War Thunder than Core i7-2675QM - 181 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2675QM - 20 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i9-7900X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
181
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£428.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80673I97900X Core Processor i9-7900X 3.3 GHz
Buy for £428.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 275 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i7-2675QM
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i9-7900X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2675QM | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
