Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Core i7-2670QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1713 days newer than Core i7-2670QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2670QM
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 9% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-2670QM - 126 vs 116 FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
126
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.4/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2670QM | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |