Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 2675 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 41% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 278 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 28 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - £49.95 vs £364.66
- Up to 81% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-14700KF - £0.25 vs £1.31 per FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
278
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.31/FPS
19%
Price, £
£364.66
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for £364.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
197
70%
Value, £/FPS
£0.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-14700KF | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |