Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10500.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 23% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-10500 - 134 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10500 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - £176.89 vs £263.03
- Up to 17% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-13700K - £1.62 vs £1.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
134
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.96/FPS
82.6530612244898%
Price, £
£263.03
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for £263.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
109
81.34328358208955%
Value, £/FPS
£1.62/FPS
100%
Price, £
£176.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £176.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1519
53.485915492957744%
Multi-Core
5470
31.060132871500766%
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |