Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11375H outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11375H is 1666 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11375H
- Performs up to 28% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 207 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
162
78%
Value, £/FPS
£0.31/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Jan 11th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11375H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Iris XE 96EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |