Buy on Amazon
£204
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700 is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 5% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 272 vs 259 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £204.0 vs £315.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £0.75 vs £1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700 - 24 vs 16 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
272
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.75/FPS
100%
Price, £
£204
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-10700 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W, BX8070110700
Buy for £204 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14145 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Processor - (12 Core/24 Threads) - YD192XA8AEWOF
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
