Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7300HQ outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7300HQ is 197 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7300HQ
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7300HQ - 8 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
163
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.31/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7300HQ | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |