Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Core i5-5350U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2207 days newer than Core i5-5350U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5350U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-5350U - 122 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5350U - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
122
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.57/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £69.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5350U | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 6000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |