Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5257U outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-5257U is 859 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5257U
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than FX-8350 - 116 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 28 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5257U - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-5257U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5257U | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Broadwell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel Iris 6100 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
