Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i5-480M vs Xeon E5-1620 v4

Core i5-480M vs Xeon E5-1620 v4: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Core i5-480M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1989 days newer than Core i5-480M.

Advantages of Intel Core i5-480M

  • Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts

Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4

  • Performs up to 5% better in Fortnite than Core i5-480M - 222 vs 211 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-480M - 8 vs 4 threads
This is a free version of Fortnite.
Fortnite

Fortnite

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Epic

Intel Core i5-480M Logo
Core i5-480M

Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011


FPS

211

95%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo
Xeon E5-1620 v4

Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016


FPS

222

100%

Value, £/FPS

£0.23/FPS

100%

Price, £

£49.95

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Corp. BX80660E51620V4 Xeon Processor E5-1620 v4

Buy for £49.95 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 216 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Epic

Intel Core i5-480M Logo
Core i5-480M

Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo
Xeon E5-1620 v4

Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i5-480M Logo
Core i5-480M

Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011


Single-Core

368

33%

Multi-Core

701

17%

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo
Xeon E5-1620 v4

Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016


Single-Core

1088

100%

Multi-Core

3898

100%

Intel Core i5-480M Logo

Intel Core i5-480M

vs
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4

Jan 9th, 2011Release Date
Jun 20th, 2016
Core i5CollectionXeon E5
ArrandaleCodenameBroadwell-E/EP
Intel Socket G1SocketIntel Socket 2011-3
Mobile
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
4
4Threads
8
2.7 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.5 GHz
2.9 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
3.8 GHz
35 W
TDP140 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
20.0xMultiplier
35.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.