Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670S outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670S is 1114 days older than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 1% better in HITMAN 3 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 197 vs 196 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 8 vs 4 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
196
99.49238578680203%
Value, £/FPS
£0.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670S | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |