Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - £71.18 vs £224.84
- Up to 68% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-10400 - £0.59 vs £1.84 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-4670K - 122 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670K - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
120
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.59/FPS
100%
Price, £
£71.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £71.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.84/FPS
32%
Price, £
£224.84
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for £224.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |