Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2558 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 6% better in Deathloop than FX-4350 - 178 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - £59.97 vs £224.84
- Up to 71% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-10400 - £0.36 vs £1.26 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.26/FPS
28%
Price, £
£224.84
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for £224.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |