Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Core i5-4258U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1112 days newer than Core i5-4258U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4258U
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 28 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 2% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-4258U - 287 vs 281 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4258U - 8 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
287
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.17/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4258U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 5100 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |