Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1896 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £72.53 vs £315.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £0.77 vs £3.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 10% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-3570 - 103 vs 94 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 24 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £72.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
103
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.06/FPS
25%
Price, £
£315
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |