Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3470S outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3470S is 1187 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Performs up to 0% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G3900 - 209 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i5-3470S - £19.99 vs £29.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i5-3470S - £0.1 vs £0.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470S - 51 vs 65 Watts
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Buy for £29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
208
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |