Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1420 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Metro Exodus than FX-6100 - 140 vs 139 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
