Buy on Amazon
£32.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $184
Availability
MSRP in USD: $184
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3470 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3470 is 1187 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-3470 - £19.99 vs £32.99
- Up to 41% better value when playing Control than Core i5-3470 - £0.1 vs £0.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 51 vs 77 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i5-3470 Quad-Core 3.2GHz CPU with 77W TDP and LGA 1155 Interface
Buy for £32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
199
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£19.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8 Processor - Affordable and Reliable
Buy for £19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-3470
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 77 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
