Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4590 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4590 is 488 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Core i5-4590 - 51 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590
- Performs up to 3% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Celeron G3900 - 213 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i5-4590
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
51.59857904085258%
Multi-Core
992
31.59235668789809%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-4590 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
