Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i5-3210M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2412 days newer than Core i5-3210M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3210M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-3210M - 116 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3210M - 6 vs 4 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
116
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£127.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £127.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3210M | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |