Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Core i5-3210M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2517 days newer than Core i5-3210M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3210M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-3210M - 204 vs 191 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
204
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.53/FPS
100%
Price, £
£108.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £108.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3210M | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |