Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Core i5-2410M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1966 days newer than Core i5-2410M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2410M
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 13% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-2410M - 121 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2410M - 8 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2410M | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |