Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1646 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 3400G - 198 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - £69.99 vs £195.63
- Up to 58% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-14400F - £0.42 vs £0.99 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
198
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.99/FPS
42%
Price, £
£195.63
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for £195.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
168
84%
Value, £/FPS
£0.42/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |