Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 17% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G3930 - 182 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - £39.99 vs £163.31
- Up to 71% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-13400F - £0.26 vs £0.9 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for £163.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
156
85%
Value, £/FPS
£0.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |