Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 294 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Minecraft than Celeron G6900 - 803 vs 732 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - £66.59 vs £160.16
- Up to 55% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-11600KF - £0.09 vs £0.2 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
803
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.2/FPS
44%
Price, £
£160.16
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for £160.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
732
91%
Value, £/FPS
£0.09/FPS
100%
Price, £
£66.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £66.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |