Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2844 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4770.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Core i7-4770 - 284 vs 271 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i7-4770 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - £80.06 vs £132.79
- Up to 36% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-11400F - £0.3 vs £0.47 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
284
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.47/FPS
63%
Price, £
£132.79
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for £132.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3297 minutes ago
Buy for £80.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3298 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i7-4770 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |