Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - £80.06 vs £98.8
- Up to 17% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-10400F - £0.15 vs £0.18 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-4770 - 562 vs 531 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i7-4770 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
531
94%
Value, £/FPS
£0.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£80.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £80.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6682 minutes ago
Buy for £98.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6681 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4770 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |