Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3305 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 81% better in F1 23 than FX-6200 - 260 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
260
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£132.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £132.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14534 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 3 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |