Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 587 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 6% better in God of War than EPYC 7742 - 182 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 65 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 128 vs 12 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
182
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.73/FPS
100%
Price, £
£132.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £132.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10053 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD EPYC 7742 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | EPYC |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Rome |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 64 |
12 | Threads | 128 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 225 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 22.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |