Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1655 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v5.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 6% better in FIFA 23 than Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 163 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
163
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.61/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £98.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7911 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 80 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |