Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v5 is 1357 days older than Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Performs up to 6% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 5 3400G - 174 vs 164 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
164
94%
Value, £/FPS
£0.5/FPS
100%
Price, £
£81.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £81.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18443 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |