Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9350KF outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9350KF is 932 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9350KF
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 169 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 91 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 8 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
163
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.31/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9350KF | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |