Buy on Amazon
£49.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100T outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100T is 803 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Performs up to 2% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 684 vs 669 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
669
97.80701754385966%
Value, £/FPS
£0.07/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Corp. BX80660E51620V4 Xeon Processor E5-1620 v4
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3815 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-9100T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
